The Vermont Cynic

No damages awarded after trial

Ex-staffer sues UVM for gendered salary discrimination, but jury awards no damages after three hours of deliberation

News Staff Report

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story


ALEK FLEURY/The Vermont Cynic
Cynthia Ruescher, a former UVM techemployee, and her sister, Cathleen Lee Wilkins, leave the courthouse at the end of the third day of her trial against UVM April 19. Cindy filed a lawsuit against UVM based on gender discrimination and illegal retaliation.

Following three hours of deliberations, a jury ruled that UVM did not mistreat a former information technology employee in a lawsuit she filed seeking financial damages.

Cynthia Reuscher, a former Enterprise Technology Services employee, filed suit against the University in 2014, and was laid off from UVM in 2015, having worked for the University since 2001. She sought approximately $4.5 million in damages.

“UVM’s very grateful to the jury for their careful consideration of all the evidence,’ UVM attorney Karen McAndrew said. ‘We believe the jury reached the correct result based on all the testimony and evidence produced at trial.’

Reuscher claimed that the University violated the Equal Pay Act, intentionally discriminated against her because she is a woman, retaliated against her for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, defamed her and created a hostile work environment.

The claims for both hostile work environment and Equal Pay Act violations were dismissed by Judge Robert A. Mello for lack of evidence, and not decided upon by the jury.

In closing arguments, Reuscher’s attorney Siobhan McCloskey directly attacked the University.

“[UVM is] like a child with chocolate on their face, and when their mother asks if they ate the chocolate bar, the child says no, even though it’s obvious that they’re lying,” she said.

“UVM is lying for their reasons for terminating her. That’s wrong and it shouldn’t be allowed.”

UVM’s lawyer Karen McAndrews said that Reuscher’s case was like a line from a nursery rhyme.

“When the whole world’s wrong, and you’re the one who’s right, it’s time to go to bed at night,” McAndrews said.

McAndrews said that the adult version is “When the whole world’s wrong, and you’re the one who’s right, it’s time to reconsider your position.”

The trial, which ran from April 16 to 20, involved testimony regarding an incident in September 2016 where another former UVM employee brought a gun to the home of some UVM students.

Keith Kennedy, Reuscher’s former supervisor, testified that he had watched porn in the office. Ruescher said this contributed to her charge of a hostile workplace.

Earlier that week, UVM associate attorney Kendall Hoechst shed tears after a confrontation with McCloskey.

1 Comment

One Response to “No damages awarded after trial”

  1. Steve Michael rose on April 24th, 2018 3:13 pm

    Well Cynic, it’s time you wrote about the real injustice here that is supported by evidence supplied during trial. Here’s hoping you do your job and investigate why a GUY can lie on his application that he has two BS degrees instead of one and get paid more than a woman with a BS degree and a Masters degree in HER application, without lying.
    And after being alerted of this, the liar is not even questioned or punished.
    We all await your investigative report.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

The University of Vermont's Independent Voice Since 1883
No damages awarded after trial