Response to “Mandated Reporting Issue”
May 11, 2018
As the Intake and Outreach Coordinator for the Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity (which addresses incidents of discrimination and harassment on campus, including sexual misconduct and assault), I am writing in response to the “Mandated Reporting Issue” staff editorial in the April 25, 2018 online edition of the Cynic.
Experiencing an incident of sexual assault or sexual misconduct is undoubtedly one of the most difficult things that can happen to a student.
Disclosing such a deeply personal and traumatizing event to anyone — let alone to a University official — takes a lot of strength, trust and courage.
While some oppose mandatory reporting out of the reasonable concern that it detracts from a survivor’s sense of control over an already traumatizing situation, it is a best and necessary practice for institutions because it enables them to address sexual misconduct and sexual assault, to understand potential serious trends and to better provide education and prevention resources.
When AAEO receives a report of sexual misconduct, my role is to provide support services and reporting options to the individual who disclosed the incident(s).
A survivor is in complete control over the services they choose to receive or not to receive. They decide whether or not they want to take
administrative and/or criminal action.
Absent very rare exceptions, UVM does not force an investigation of sexual assault or misconduct against the wishes of a survivor.
In every report that AAEO receives, however, students are offered a range of support and services that may help them tremendously in the wake of a difficult or traumatizing event, such as housing options, academic assistance, no-contact orders, and other appropriate measures.
I work with students to answer their questions and make sure that they understand the criminal and institutional reporting options that are available to them.
It is also important to note that students can receive a full range of support and services, regardless of whether or not they choose to file a formal complaint.
UVM wants every survivor to feel safe reporting these incidents.
While I appreciate the concern for protecting the autonomy of survivors, UVM has a duty to prevent these acts from occurring at our institution, and to provide survivors with support and resources to help them through a very difficult time.
Without mandated reporting, I fear that our ability to offer these critical services to students (who may not otherwise know that they exist), and to respond promptly and effectively to incidents of sexual misconduct and sexual assault that occur in our community, would be greatly diminished.
UVM offers a range of relevant confidential and non-confidential resources. These resources are
exempt from CSA reporting requirements:
On-campus Confidential Resources:
Campus Victim’s Advocate (802)656-7892
UVM Counseling & Psychiatry Services (802)656-3340
Student Health Center (802)656-3350
EAP (for employees) 1-866-660-9533
Community Confidential Resources:
HOPE Works 1-800-489-7273 (24 hr. hotline) – (802)863-1236
Vermont Center for Crime Victim Services (802)241-1250
Steps to End Domestic Violence (802)658-1996
SafeSpace (Pride Center of Vermont) (802)860-7812
We encourage individuals to seek support and to report sexual misconduct. A student who has experienced sexual misconduct or sexual assault may wish to pursue an administrative AAEO investigation, a criminal investigation, both, or neither.
AAEO is also available to provide academic, residential, and other support as appropriate, regardless of whether or not a student pursues an
investigation.
Non-Confidential Sexual Misconduct Resources:
Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity (AAEO): 802-656-3368
Online reporting form available at: www.uvm.edu/aaeo
UVM Police Services: 802-656-3473 or 911 in an emergency www.uvm.edu/police
Taryn Moran, Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Intake and Outreach Coordinator
Abby • May 24, 2018 at 7:55 am
Keely –
Read this response by someone employed by the University of Vermont.
This office is responsible for the investigation of alleged sexual misconduct. They are also the judge and the jury in the campus investigation. Affirmative Action became law under President Kennedy to help protect the rights of Minorities and Women in the workplace and elsewhere. The empathy for the person making the accusations is evident in her vocabulary. First, she is using the term Survivor. This implies that the accusation did occur. She should be using the proper terminology for the accuser, the complainant. The alleged assailant is the respondant.
Also, she expresses her respect for complainants by stating “Disclosing such a Traumatizing event takes strength, trust and courage.
How can a student that was accused of misconduct get a “fair” trial when the investigator, judge and jury already beleive the respondant is guilty? The office that is adjudicating the accusation is desigend to stand on the side of women?
The UVM process maintains the very minimum protection standard for those that are accused of misconduct. Because of this process studentlose cnstitutional rights. Someone accused of any type of crime should have the ability to question the allegations (not just tell their side of the story), have legal representation available to speak on their behalf, and have a NEAUTRAL judiciary. UVM provides none. If your friend, your brother or cousin, or your future son is accused at UVM they are fucked. They will be suspended or expelled. They will not be able to transfer into another academic institution. Once reinstated they will not be able to travel abroad with school groups or go to graduate school. Believe me I know.
Why is that the Burlington Police department can investigate an accusation of misconduct and find no reason to bring charges or pursue the case? Yet the UVM Office of Affirmative Action can investigate the same case and find enough fault to expel a student. The student loses their constitutional rights and then their ability to get an education. Shouldn’t the trial and the process be fair?
How can it be when the the accused is guilty until proven innocent?
The process is wrong!!
Abby